$AXIS team's statement on 25% of circulating supply dump Such textbook response template lol AXIS Team Statement Summary 1. We didn't sell it 2. It was our ecosystem allocation so we gave tokens to partners 3. According to original contract shouldn't be sold but they violated contract and did full dump 4. This is contract violation so we're not dealing with them now We've seen this game way too many times haven't we? 1. If it really was a contract that couldn't be sold, vesting should've been applied 2. If the other party (parties) violated contract and dumped everything, why not specifically reveal who they are? In crypto culture even a scratch gets exposed all over X right? 3. Usually when physical details aren't mentioned like that : just team's backside or influencer marketing or MM Same exact template statement, recent project I remember is $GAIB lol (attached image capture)