모네로 XMR

코인이지 공지방11d ago

Smart money stock futures market grows, ONDO funding lone positive. Stock-type products like MU, SNDK, INTC have dominated the top open interest on Hyperliquid futures. ONDO surged +32.5% in 24 hours, showing the hottest momentum in crypto, while XMR and SMSN show negative funding rates with short pressure applied. Coinease Insight. Stock futures OI structure has solidified to dominate crypto. INTC shows clear long concentration at +5.3% price with $138.7M OI, while SMSN has funding at -0.00044 with shorts pressing down, showing downside betting dominance. Among crypto, ONDO surged +32.5% alone, drawing buying momentum. Investor Action Plan - INTC Long overheating zone, watch for funding rotation - SMSN Short advantage, confirm any rebound - ONDO Surge entering overheating zone, avoid Key one-liner: Only ONDO runs alone in the stock futures market. Powered by Nansen 👉 Learn more 📢 Notice Channel · 💬 Comms Channel · ✖️ X #SmartMoney #OnChain #Coinease

47HyperliquidRWAShow Korean original

(주)청년열정민트초코12d ago

Thorchain Recent Governance Summary Slightly Organized (Normally I'd just say "why not check out Thorchain's recent governance" and end it, but since I fired up GPT anyway, I ran AI and organized it for you) Basic direction in one line: Changed from burn-centric to protocol directly growing liquidity. Originally 5% of revenue was burned, now 1%. Instead 20% of revenue goes into POL 1. System Income Distribution Structure Changed: Nodes 59% / POL 20% / TCY 10% / Dev 5% / Marketing 5% / RUNE Burn 1%. Cut burn from previous 5% to 1%, instead starting to put 20% into Protocol Owned Liquidity (POL) 2. POL Activation: Protocol builds LP directly from revenue earned, making pools deeper. Moving from "burning away" to "productively locking RUNE" 3. New Chain Integration Resuming: Resuming mainnet integration for Zcash → Monero in that order, delayed due to stability issues. (XMR scheduled for soft launch) 4. Revenue Diversification Experiment: Testing affiliate fee, SwapKit revenue share, Houdini privacy routing etc. to reduce Dev Fund dependency and operate through own revenue (Houdini addition has some internal noise but you don't need to worry about that) Read original: https://blog.thorchain.org/how-thorchain-s-new-system-income-distribution-works

771Show Korean original

CEN13d ago

Why don't hackers buy privacy coins? I was curious so I asked an AI, and here's the answer: 1) The market is small XMR and ZEC have market cap and trading volume way smaller than ETH. If hacking and ransom scale up, privacy coins alone can't handle the volume—if moved in large amounts, the price collapses immediately. So big money moves to liquid assets like ETH instead. 2) Exchanges won't list them Because of regulations, many major exchanges have delisted privacy coins. It's hard for victims to recover funds, and it's hard for criminals to cash out. So the pattern becomes "XMR if possible, BTC/ETH if not." 3) ZEC isn't anonymous by default Zcash requires you to manually enable anonymous transactions, and in reality most movement happens through transparent addresses. It's a privacy coin in name only, so it doesn't work as well as XMR for criminal funding. So ZEC is rarely used. 4) The stolen money is already on ETH Assets sitting on exchanges, DeFi, and bridges are usually in ETH, USDT, USDC. Especially with major hacks—it's not "because we love ETH," it's because the money is there. So they take ETH. 5) Hiding and spending are different things XMR can make tracing difficult. But later when you want to swap to another coin or spend it like cash, you ultimately need liquid assets. So at some point it converts to ETH, BTC, or stablecoins. 6) Conclusion On anonymity alone, XMR is better. On actually moving big money, ETH is better. Hackers aim for profit—if they can't sell, it means nothing. So they end up converting to ETH anyway. #Hacking

5.5KBitcoinEthereumZcashShow Korean original

무사시의 코인베기15d ago

PoUW - Proof of Useful Work PoUW isn't just burning massive computation like traditional PoW—it connects actually useful computation like AI inference or ZK Proofs directly to network security and token issuance. I think the two most standout projects in the PoUW sector are Pearl (PRL) and Nockchain (NOCK). On Twitter, you see this dynamic forming like ZEC:XMR. If I had to make a very simple analogy for the two projects: PRL = AI Bitcoin, NOCK = AI Ethereum. Pearl's structure is simple and clear. One of the most basic operations AI performs during inference is Matrix Multiplication. Pearl wants to use this AI computation itself as mining work. So with the same GPU, you can run AI inference and simultaneously generate mining revenue. From a GPU operator's perspective, you get two revenue streams: Inference Revenue + Mining Revenue. If an AI company has to do the computation anyway and can use it directly while getting additional token rewards on top, it ultimately lowers inference costs themselves. ex) Together AI Nock is closer to a project trying to put not just AI but ZK Proofs and future various kinds of verifiable computation all into a single network economy. It started with a structure using ZK Proof generation computation as PoW, but recently it's expanded scope toward AI by adding an AI Compute Network. Especially through the Logos update, Nock adopted Pearl's PoUW as AI-PoW, making Merge Mining possible—so you can mine both PRL and NOCK with a single compute workload without having to perform the same computation twice. Down the line, through Full ZKVM and NockApps, the long-term direction is to expand into a platform that can verify and process various kinds of computation, and add Privacy, Private DeFi, and Post Quantum Security. The biggest problem though is that while Nock's trajectory direction is big, the critical roadmap extends through end of 2027, so the market has quite a long wait ahead.

2.9KSpread to 4 channelsBitcoinEthereumZcashShow Korean original